mirror of
https://github.com/ceres-solver/ceres-solver.git
synced 2026-08-29 08:34:37 +08:00
4a3f008e6a
Normally we expect it to be the case that inner iteration cost will be less than the trust region cost, but due to round off error it can be that it is larger, so make the test for inner iteration being successful to be stricter. Change-Id: Icbafe9fc6a311940d5368cca78eeac7ccd5fa943
848 lines
32 KiB
C++
848 lines
32 KiB
C++
// Ceres Solver - A fast non-linear least squares minimizer
|
|
// Copyright 2023 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
// http://ceres-solver.org/
|
|
//
|
|
// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
|
|
//
|
|
// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
|
|
// this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the ab%ove copyright notice,
|
|
// this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
|
|
// and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
|
// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its contributors may be
|
|
// used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without
|
|
// specific prior written permission.
|
|
//
|
|
// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
|
|
// AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
|
|
// IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
|
|
// ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
|
|
// LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
|
|
// CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
|
|
// SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
|
|
// INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
|
|
// CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
|
|
// ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
|
|
// POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
//
|
|
// Author: sameeragarwal@google.com (Sameer Agarwal)
|
|
|
|
#include "ceres/trust_region_minimizer.h"
|
|
|
|
#include <algorithm>
|
|
#include <cmath>
|
|
#include <cstdlib>
|
|
#include <cstring>
|
|
#include <limits>
|
|
#include <memory>
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
#include <vector>
|
|
|
|
#include "Eigen/Core"
|
|
#include "absl/log/check.h"
|
|
#include "absl/log/log.h"
|
|
#include "absl/strings/str_format.h"
|
|
#include "absl/time/clock.h"
|
|
#include "absl/time/time.h"
|
|
#include "ceres/array_utils.h"
|
|
#include "ceres/coordinate_descent_minimizer.h"
|
|
#include "ceres/eigen_vector_ops.h"
|
|
#include "ceres/evaluator.h"
|
|
#include "ceres/file.h"
|
|
#include "ceres/line_search.h"
|
|
#include "ceres/parallel_for.h"
|
|
#include "ceres/types.h"
|
|
|
|
// Helper macro to simplify some of the control flow.
|
|
#define RETURN_IF_ERROR_AND_LOG(expr) \
|
|
do { \
|
|
if (!(expr)) { \
|
|
LOG(ERROR) << "Terminating: " << solver_summary_->message; \
|
|
return; \
|
|
} \
|
|
} while (0)
|
|
|
|
namespace ceres::internal {
|
|
|
|
void TrustRegionMinimizer::Minimize(const Minimizer::Options& options,
|
|
double* parameters,
|
|
Solver::Summary* solver_summary) {
|
|
start_time_ = absl::Now();
|
|
iteration_start_time_ = start_time_;
|
|
Init(options, parameters, solver_summary);
|
|
RETURN_IF_ERROR_AND_LOG(IterationZero());
|
|
|
|
// Create the TrustRegionStepEvaluator. The construction needs to be
|
|
// delayed to this point because we need the cost for the starting
|
|
// point to initialize the step evaluator.
|
|
step_evaluator_ = std::make_unique<TrustRegionStepEvaluator>(
|
|
x_cost_,
|
|
options_.use_nonmonotonic_steps
|
|
? options_.max_consecutive_nonmonotonic_steps
|
|
: 0);
|
|
|
|
bool atleast_one_successful_step = false;
|
|
while (FinalizeIterationAndCheckIfMinimizerCanContinue()) {
|
|
iteration_start_time_ = absl::Now();
|
|
|
|
const double previous_gradient_norm = iteration_summary_.gradient_norm;
|
|
const double previous_gradient_max_norm =
|
|
iteration_summary_.gradient_max_norm;
|
|
|
|
iteration_summary_ = IterationSummary();
|
|
iteration_summary_.iteration =
|
|
solver_summary->iterations.back().iteration + 1;
|
|
|
|
RETURN_IF_ERROR_AND_LOG(ComputeTrustRegionStep());
|
|
if (!iteration_summary_.step_is_valid) {
|
|
RETURN_IF_ERROR_AND_LOG(HandleInvalidStep());
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (options_.is_constrained &&
|
|
options_.max_num_line_search_step_size_iterations > 0) {
|
|
// Use a projected line search to enforce the bounds constraints
|
|
// and improve the quality of the step.
|
|
DoLineSearch(x_, gradient_, x_cost_, &delta_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ComputeCandidatePointAndEvaluateCost();
|
|
DoInnerIterationsIfNeeded();
|
|
|
|
if (atleast_one_successful_step && ParameterToleranceReached()) {
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (FunctionToleranceReached()) {
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (IsStepSuccessful()) {
|
|
atleast_one_successful_step = true;
|
|
RETURN_IF_ERROR_AND_LOG(HandleSuccessfulStep());
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Declare the step unsuccessful and inform the trust region strategy.
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_is_successful = false;
|
|
iteration_summary_.cost = candidate_cost_ + solver_summary_->fixed_cost;
|
|
|
|
// When the step is unsuccessful, we do not compute the gradient
|
|
// (or update x), so we preserve its value from the last
|
|
// successful iteration.
|
|
iteration_summary_.gradient_norm = previous_gradient_norm;
|
|
iteration_summary_.gradient_max_norm = previous_gradient_max_norm;
|
|
strategy_->StepRejected(iteration_summary_.relative_decrease);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Initialize the minimizer, allocate working space and set some of
|
|
// the fields in the solver_summary.
|
|
void TrustRegionMinimizer::Init(const Minimizer::Options& options,
|
|
double* parameters,
|
|
Solver::Summary* solver_summary) {
|
|
options_ = options;
|
|
std::sort(options_.trust_region_minimizer_iterations_to_dump.begin(),
|
|
options_.trust_region_minimizer_iterations_to_dump.end());
|
|
|
|
parameters_ = parameters;
|
|
|
|
solver_summary_ = solver_summary;
|
|
solver_summary_->termination_type = NO_CONVERGENCE;
|
|
solver_summary_->num_successful_steps = 0;
|
|
solver_summary_->num_unsuccessful_steps = 0;
|
|
solver_summary_->is_constrained = options.is_constrained;
|
|
|
|
CHECK(options_.evaluator != nullptr);
|
|
CHECK(options_.jacobian != nullptr);
|
|
CHECK(options_.trust_region_strategy != nullptr);
|
|
evaluator_ = options_.evaluator.get();
|
|
jacobian_ = options_.jacobian.get();
|
|
strategy_ = options_.trust_region_strategy.get();
|
|
|
|
is_not_silent_ = !options.is_silent;
|
|
inner_iterations_are_enabled_ =
|
|
options.inner_iteration_minimizer.get() != nullptr;
|
|
inner_iterations_were_useful_ = false;
|
|
|
|
num_parameters_ = evaluator_->NumParameters();
|
|
num_effective_parameters_ = evaluator_->NumEffectiveParameters();
|
|
num_residuals_ = evaluator_->NumResiduals();
|
|
num_consecutive_invalid_steps_ = 0;
|
|
|
|
x_ = ConstVectorRef(parameters_, num_parameters_);
|
|
residuals_.resize(num_residuals_);
|
|
trust_region_step_.resize(num_effective_parameters_);
|
|
delta_.resize(num_effective_parameters_);
|
|
candidate_x_.resize(num_parameters_);
|
|
gradient_.resize(num_effective_parameters_);
|
|
model_residuals_.resize(num_residuals_);
|
|
negative_gradient_.resize(num_effective_parameters_);
|
|
projected_gradient_step_.resize(num_parameters_);
|
|
|
|
// By default scaling is one, if the user requests Jacobi scaling of
|
|
// the Jacobian, we will compute and overwrite this vector.
|
|
jacobian_scaling_ = Vector::Ones(num_effective_parameters_);
|
|
|
|
x_cost_ = std::numeric_limits<double>::max();
|
|
minimum_cost_ = x_cost_;
|
|
model_cost_change_ = 0.0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 1. Project the initial solution onto the feasible set if needed.
|
|
// 2. Compute the initial cost, jacobian & gradient.
|
|
//
|
|
// Return true if all computations can be performed successfully.
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::IterationZero() {
|
|
iteration_summary_ = IterationSummary();
|
|
iteration_summary_.iteration = 0;
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_is_valid = false;
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_is_successful = false;
|
|
iteration_summary_.cost_change = 0.0;
|
|
iteration_summary_.gradient_max_norm = 0.0;
|
|
iteration_summary_.gradient_norm = 0.0;
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_norm = 0.0;
|
|
iteration_summary_.relative_decrease = 0.0;
|
|
iteration_summary_.eta = options_.eta;
|
|
iteration_summary_.linear_solver_iterations = 0;
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_solver_time_in_seconds = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (options_.is_constrained) {
|
|
delta_.setZero();
|
|
if (!evaluator_->Plus(x_.data(), delta_.data(), candidate_x_.data())) {
|
|
solver_summary_->message =
|
|
"Unable to project initial point onto the feasible set.";
|
|
solver_summary_->termination_type = FAILURE;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
x_ = candidate_x_;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!EvaluateGradientAndJacobian(/*new_evaluation_point=*/true)) {
|
|
solver_summary_->message =
|
|
"Initial residual and Jacobian evaluation failed.";
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
solver_summary_->initial_cost = x_cost_ + solver_summary_->fixed_cost;
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_is_valid = true;
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_is_successful = true;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// For the current x_, compute
|
|
//
|
|
// 1. Cost
|
|
// 2. Jacobian
|
|
// 3. Gradient
|
|
// 4. Scale the Jacobian if needed (and compute the scaling if we are
|
|
// in iteration zero).
|
|
// 5. Compute the 2 and max norm of the gradient.
|
|
//
|
|
// Returns true if all computations could be performed
|
|
// successfully. Any failures are considered fatal and the
|
|
// Solver::Summary is updated to indicate this.
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::EvaluateGradientAndJacobian(
|
|
bool new_evaluation_point) {
|
|
Evaluator::EvaluateOptions evaluate_options;
|
|
evaluate_options.new_evaluation_point = new_evaluation_point;
|
|
if (!evaluator_->Evaluate(evaluate_options,
|
|
x_.data(),
|
|
&x_cost_,
|
|
residuals_.data(),
|
|
gradient_.data(),
|
|
jacobian_)) {
|
|
solver_summary_->message = "Residual and Jacobian evaluation failed.";
|
|
solver_summary_->termination_type = FAILURE;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
iteration_summary_.cost = x_cost_ + solver_summary_->fixed_cost;
|
|
|
|
if (options_.jacobi_scaling) {
|
|
if (iteration_summary_.iteration == 0) {
|
|
// Compute a scaling vector that is used to improve the
|
|
// conditioning of the Jacobian.
|
|
//
|
|
// jacobian_scaling_ = diag(J'J)^{-1}
|
|
jacobian_->SquaredColumnNorm(jacobian_scaling_.data());
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < jacobian_->num_cols(); ++i) {
|
|
// Add one to the denominator to prevent division by zero.
|
|
jacobian_scaling_[i] = 1.0 / (1.0 + sqrt(jacobian_scaling_[i]));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// jacobian = jacobian * diag(J'J) ^{-1}
|
|
jacobian_->ScaleColumns(
|
|
jacobian_scaling_.data(), options_.context, options_.num_threads);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The gradient exists in the local tangent space. To account for
|
|
// the bounds constraints correctly, instead of just computing the
|
|
// norm of the gradient vector, we compute
|
|
//
|
|
// |Plus(x, -gradient) - x|
|
|
//
|
|
// Where the Plus operator lifts the negative gradient to the
|
|
// ambient space, adds it to x and projects it on the hypercube
|
|
// defined by the bounds.
|
|
negative_gradient_ = -gradient_;
|
|
if (!evaluator_->Plus(x_.data(),
|
|
negative_gradient_.data(),
|
|
projected_gradient_step_.data())) {
|
|
solver_summary_->message =
|
|
"projected_gradient_step = Plus(x, -gradient) failed.";
|
|
solver_summary_->termination_type = FAILURE;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
iteration_summary_.gradient_max_norm =
|
|
(x_ - projected_gradient_step_).lpNorm<Eigen::Infinity>();
|
|
iteration_summary_.gradient_norm = (x_ - projected_gradient_step_).norm();
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 1. Add the final timing information to the iteration summary.
|
|
// 2. Run the callbacks
|
|
// 3. Check for termination based on
|
|
// a. Run time
|
|
// b. Iteration count
|
|
// c. Max norm of the gradient
|
|
// d. Size of the trust region radius.
|
|
//
|
|
// Returns true if user did not terminate the solver and none of these
|
|
// termination criterion are met.
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::FinalizeIterationAndCheckIfMinimizerCanContinue() {
|
|
if (iteration_summary_.step_is_successful) {
|
|
++solver_summary_->num_successful_steps;
|
|
if (x_cost_ < minimum_cost_) {
|
|
minimum_cost_ = x_cost_;
|
|
VectorRef(parameters_, num_parameters_) = x_;
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_is_nonmonotonic = false;
|
|
} else {
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_is_nonmonotonic = true;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
++solver_summary_->num_unsuccessful_steps;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
iteration_summary_.trust_region_radius = strategy_->Radius();
|
|
const absl::Time now = absl::Now();
|
|
iteration_summary_.iteration_time_in_seconds =
|
|
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(now - iteration_start_time_);
|
|
iteration_summary_.cumulative_time_in_seconds =
|
|
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(now - start_time_) +
|
|
solver_summary_->preprocessor_time_in_seconds;
|
|
|
|
solver_summary_->iterations.push_back(iteration_summary_);
|
|
|
|
if (!RunCallbacks(options_, iteration_summary_, solver_summary_)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (MaxSolverTimeReached()) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (MaxSolverIterationsReached()) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (GradientToleranceReached()) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (MinTrustRegionRadiusReached()) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Compute the trust region step using the TrustRegionStrategy chosen
|
|
// by the user.
|
|
//
|
|
// If the strategy returns with LinearSolverTerminationType::FATAL_ERROR, which
|
|
// indicates an unrecoverable error, return false. This is the only
|
|
// condition that returns false.
|
|
//
|
|
// If the strategy returns with LinearSolverTerminationType::FAILURE, which
|
|
// indicates a numerical failure that could be recovered from by retrying (e.g.
|
|
// by increasing the strength of the regularization), we set
|
|
// iteration_summary_.step_is_valid to false and return true.
|
|
//
|
|
// In all other cases, we compute the decrease in the trust region
|
|
// model problem. In exact arithmetic, this should always be
|
|
// positive, but due to numerical problems in the TrustRegionStrategy
|
|
// or round off error when computing the decrease it may be
|
|
// negative. In which case again, we set
|
|
// iteration_summary_.step_is_valid to false.
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::ComputeTrustRegionStep() {
|
|
const absl::Time strategy_start_time = absl::Now();
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_is_valid = false;
|
|
TrustRegionStrategy::PerSolveOptions per_solve_options;
|
|
per_solve_options.eta = options_.eta;
|
|
if (std::find(options_.trust_region_minimizer_iterations_to_dump.begin(),
|
|
options_.trust_region_minimizer_iterations_to_dump.end(),
|
|
iteration_summary_.iteration) !=
|
|
options_.trust_region_minimizer_iterations_to_dump.end()) {
|
|
per_solve_options.dump_format_type =
|
|
options_.trust_region_problem_dump_format_type;
|
|
per_solve_options.dump_filename_base =
|
|
JoinPath(options_.trust_region_problem_dump_directory,
|
|
absl::StrFormat("ceres_solver_iteration_%03d",
|
|
iteration_summary_.iteration));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TrustRegionStrategy::Summary strategy_summary =
|
|
strategy_->ComputeStep(per_solve_options,
|
|
jacobian_,
|
|
residuals_.data(),
|
|
trust_region_step_.data());
|
|
|
|
if (strategy_summary.termination_type ==
|
|
LinearSolverTerminationType::FATAL_ERROR) {
|
|
solver_summary_->message =
|
|
"Linear solver failed due to unrecoverable "
|
|
"non-numeric causes. Please see the error log for clues. ";
|
|
solver_summary_->termination_type = FAILURE;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_solver_time_in_seconds =
|
|
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(absl::Now() - strategy_start_time);
|
|
iteration_summary_.linear_solver_iterations = strategy_summary.num_iterations;
|
|
|
|
if (strategy_summary.termination_type ==
|
|
LinearSolverTerminationType::FAILURE) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// new_model_cost
|
|
// = 1/2 [f + J * step]^2
|
|
// = 1/2 [ f'f + 2f'J * step + step' * J' * J * step ]
|
|
// model_cost_change
|
|
// = cost - new_model_cost
|
|
// = f'f/2 - 1/2 [ f'f + 2f'J * step + step' * J' * J * step]
|
|
// = -f'J * step - step' * J' * J * step / 2
|
|
// = -(J * step)'(f + J * step / 2)
|
|
ParallelSetZero(options_.context, options_.num_threads, model_residuals_);
|
|
jacobian_->RightMultiplyAndAccumulate(trust_region_step_.data(),
|
|
model_residuals_.data(),
|
|
options_.context,
|
|
options_.num_threads);
|
|
model_cost_change_ = -Dot(model_residuals_,
|
|
residuals_ + model_residuals_ / 2.0,
|
|
options_.context,
|
|
options_.num_threads);
|
|
|
|
// TODO(sameeragarwal)
|
|
//
|
|
// 1. What happens if model_cost_change_ = 0
|
|
// 2. What happens if -epsilon <= model_cost_change_ < 0 for some
|
|
// small epsilon due to round off error.
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_is_valid = (model_cost_change_ > 0.0);
|
|
if (iteration_summary_.step_is_valid) {
|
|
// Undo the Jacobian column scaling.
|
|
ParallelAssign(options_.context,
|
|
options_.num_threads,
|
|
delta_,
|
|
(trust_region_step_.array() * jacobian_scaling_.array()));
|
|
num_consecutive_invalid_steps_ = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (is_not_silent_ && !iteration_summary_.step_is_valid) {
|
|
VLOG(1) << "Invalid step: current_cost: " << x_cost_
|
|
<< " absolute model cost change: " << model_cost_change_
|
|
<< " relative model cost change: "
|
|
<< (model_cost_change_ / x_cost_);
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Invalid steps can happen due to a number of reasons, and we allow a
|
|
// limited number of consecutive failures, and return false if this
|
|
// limit is exceeded.
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::HandleInvalidStep() {
|
|
// TODO(sameeragarwal): Should we be returning FAILURE or
|
|
// NO_CONVERGENCE? The solution value is still usable in many cases,
|
|
// it is not clear if we should declare the solver a failure
|
|
// entirely. For example the case where model_cost_change ~ 0.0, but
|
|
// just slightly negative.
|
|
if (++num_consecutive_invalid_steps_ >=
|
|
options_.max_num_consecutive_invalid_steps) {
|
|
solver_summary_->message = absl::StrFormat(
|
|
"Number of consecutive invalid steps more "
|
|
"than Solver::Options::max_num_consecutive_invalid_steps: %d",
|
|
options_.max_num_consecutive_invalid_steps);
|
|
solver_summary_->termination_type = FAILURE;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
strategy_->StepIsInvalid();
|
|
|
|
// We are going to try and reduce the trust region radius and
|
|
// solve again. To do this, we are going to treat this iteration
|
|
// as an unsuccessful iteration. Since the various callbacks are
|
|
// still executed, we are going to fill the iteration summary
|
|
// with data that assumes a step of length zero and no progress.
|
|
iteration_summary_.cost = x_cost_ + solver_summary_->fixed_cost;
|
|
iteration_summary_.cost_change = 0.0;
|
|
iteration_summary_.gradient_max_norm =
|
|
solver_summary_->iterations.back().gradient_max_norm;
|
|
iteration_summary_.gradient_norm =
|
|
solver_summary_->iterations.back().gradient_norm;
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_norm = 0.0;
|
|
iteration_summary_.relative_decrease = 0.0;
|
|
iteration_summary_.eta = options_.eta;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Use the supplied coordinate descent minimizer to perform inner
|
|
// iterations and compute the improvement due to it. Returns the cost
|
|
// after performing the inner iterations.
|
|
//
|
|
// The optimization is performed with candidate_x_ as the starting
|
|
// point, and if the optimization is successful, candidate_x_ will be
|
|
// updated with the optimized parameters.
|
|
void TrustRegionMinimizer::DoInnerIterationsIfNeeded() {
|
|
inner_iterations_were_useful_ = false;
|
|
if (!inner_iterations_are_enabled_ ||
|
|
candidate_cost_ >= std::numeric_limits<double>::max()) {
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const absl::Time inner_iteration_start_time = absl::Now();
|
|
++solver_summary_->num_inner_iteration_steps;
|
|
inner_iteration_x_ = candidate_x_;
|
|
Solver::Summary inner_iteration_summary;
|
|
options_.inner_iteration_minimizer->Minimize(
|
|
options_, inner_iteration_x_.data(), &inner_iteration_summary);
|
|
double inner_iteration_cost;
|
|
if (!evaluator_->Evaluate(inner_iteration_x_.data(),
|
|
&inner_iteration_cost,
|
|
nullptr,
|
|
nullptr,
|
|
nullptr)) {
|
|
if (is_not_silent_) {
|
|
VLOG(2) << "Inner iteration failed.";
|
|
}
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (is_not_silent_) {
|
|
VLOG(2) << "Inner iteration succeeded; Current cost: " << x_cost_
|
|
<< " Trust region step cost: " << candidate_cost_
|
|
<< " Inner iteration cost: " << inner_iteration_cost;
|
|
}
|
|
candidate_x_ = inner_iteration_x_;
|
|
|
|
// Normally, the quality of a trust region step is measured by
|
|
// the ratio
|
|
//
|
|
// cost_change
|
|
// r = -----------------
|
|
// model_cost_change
|
|
//
|
|
// All the change in the nonlinear objective is due to the trust
|
|
// region step so this ratio is a good measure of the quality of
|
|
// the trust region radius. However, when inner iterations are
|
|
// being used, cost_change includes the contribution of the
|
|
// inner iterations and it's not fair to credit it all to the
|
|
// trust region algorithm. So we change the ratio to be
|
|
//
|
|
// cost_change
|
|
// r = ------------------------------------------------
|
|
// (model_cost_change + inner_iteration_cost_change)
|
|
//
|
|
// Practically we do this by increasing model_cost_change by
|
|
// inner_iteration_cost_change.
|
|
|
|
const double inner_iteration_cost_change =
|
|
candidate_cost_ - inner_iteration_cost;
|
|
model_cost_change_ += inner_iteration_cost_change;
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that the inner iteration has improved over both the current
|
|
// (x_cost_) and the trust region step cost (candidate_cost). In exact
|
|
// arithmetic we would expect that inner iterations cost can't possibly be
|
|
// worse than candidate_cost, but in finite precision this can happen due to
|
|
// round-off error. So, we check that we improve upon the minimum of both.
|
|
inner_iterations_were_useful_ = inner_iteration_cost < std::min(x_cost_, candidate_cost_);
|
|
const double inner_iteration_relative_progress =
|
|
1.0 - inner_iteration_cost / candidate_cost_;
|
|
|
|
// Disable inner iterations once the relative improvement
|
|
// drops below tolerance.
|
|
inner_iterations_are_enabled_ =
|
|
(inner_iteration_relative_progress > options_.inner_iteration_tolerance);
|
|
if (is_not_silent_ && !inner_iterations_are_enabled_) {
|
|
VLOG(2) << "Disabling inner iterations. Progress : "
|
|
<< inner_iteration_relative_progress;
|
|
}
|
|
candidate_cost_ = inner_iteration_cost;
|
|
|
|
solver_summary_->inner_iteration_time_in_seconds +=
|
|
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(absl::Now() - inner_iteration_start_time);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Perform a projected line search to improve the objective function
|
|
// value along delta.
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO(sameeragarwal): The current implementation does not do
|
|
// anything illegal but is incorrect and not terribly effective.
|
|
//
|
|
// https://github.com/ceres-solver/ceres-solver/issues/187
|
|
void TrustRegionMinimizer::DoLineSearch(const Vector& x,
|
|
const Vector& gradient,
|
|
const double cost,
|
|
Vector* delta) {
|
|
LineSearchFunction line_search_function(evaluator_);
|
|
|
|
LineSearch::Options line_search_options;
|
|
line_search_options.is_silent = true;
|
|
line_search_options.interpolation_type =
|
|
options_.line_search_interpolation_type;
|
|
line_search_options.min_step_size = options_.min_line_search_step_size;
|
|
line_search_options.sufficient_decrease =
|
|
options_.line_search_sufficient_function_decrease;
|
|
line_search_options.max_step_contraction =
|
|
options_.max_line_search_step_contraction;
|
|
line_search_options.min_step_contraction =
|
|
options_.min_line_search_step_contraction;
|
|
line_search_options.max_num_iterations =
|
|
options_.max_num_line_search_step_size_iterations;
|
|
line_search_options.sufficient_curvature_decrease =
|
|
options_.line_search_sufficient_curvature_decrease;
|
|
line_search_options.max_step_expansion =
|
|
options_.max_line_search_step_expansion;
|
|
line_search_options.function = &line_search_function;
|
|
|
|
std::string message;
|
|
std::unique_ptr<LineSearch> line_search(
|
|
LineSearch::Create(ceres::ARMIJO, line_search_options, &message));
|
|
LineSearch::Summary line_search_summary;
|
|
line_search_function.Init(x, *delta);
|
|
line_search->Search(1.0, cost, gradient.dot(*delta), &line_search_summary);
|
|
|
|
solver_summary_->num_line_search_steps += line_search_summary.num_iterations;
|
|
solver_summary_->line_search_cost_evaluation_time_in_seconds +=
|
|
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(line_search_summary.cost_evaluation_time);
|
|
solver_summary_->line_search_gradient_evaluation_time_in_seconds +=
|
|
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(line_search_summary.gradient_evaluation_time);
|
|
solver_summary_->line_search_polynomial_minimization_time_in_seconds +=
|
|
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(line_search_summary.polynomial_minimization_time);
|
|
solver_summary_->line_search_total_time_in_seconds +=
|
|
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(line_search_summary.total_time);
|
|
|
|
if (line_search_summary.success) {
|
|
*delta *= line_search_summary.optimal_point.x;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check if the maximum amount of time allowed by the user for the
|
|
// solver has been exceeded, and if so return false after updating
|
|
// Solver::Summary::message.
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::MaxSolverTimeReached() {
|
|
const double total_solver_time =
|
|
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(absl::Now() - start_time_) +
|
|
solver_summary_->preprocessor_time_in_seconds;
|
|
if (total_solver_time < options_.max_solver_time_in_seconds) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
solver_summary_->message = absl::StrFormat(
|
|
"Maximum solver time reached. "
|
|
"Total solver time: %e >= %e.",
|
|
total_solver_time,
|
|
options_.max_solver_time_in_seconds);
|
|
solver_summary_->termination_type = NO_CONVERGENCE;
|
|
if (is_not_silent_) {
|
|
VLOG(1) << "Terminating: " << solver_summary_->message;
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check if the maximum number of iterations allowed by the user for
|
|
// the solver has been exceeded, and if so return false after updating
|
|
// Solver::Summary::message.
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::MaxSolverIterationsReached() {
|
|
if (iteration_summary_.iteration < options_.max_num_iterations) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
solver_summary_->message = absl::StrFormat(
|
|
"Maximum number of iterations reached. "
|
|
"Number of iterations: %d.",
|
|
iteration_summary_.iteration);
|
|
|
|
solver_summary_->termination_type = NO_CONVERGENCE;
|
|
if (is_not_silent_) {
|
|
VLOG(1) << "Terminating: " << solver_summary_->message;
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check convergence based on the max norm of the gradient (only for
|
|
// iterations where the step was declared successful).
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::GradientToleranceReached() {
|
|
if (!iteration_summary_.step_is_successful ||
|
|
iteration_summary_.gradient_max_norm > options_.gradient_tolerance) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
solver_summary_->message = absl::StrFormat(
|
|
"Gradient tolerance reached. "
|
|
"Gradient max norm: %e <= %e",
|
|
iteration_summary_.gradient_max_norm,
|
|
options_.gradient_tolerance);
|
|
solver_summary_->termination_type = CONVERGENCE;
|
|
if (is_not_silent_) {
|
|
VLOG(1) << "Terminating: " << solver_summary_->message;
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check convergence based the size of the trust region radius.
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::MinTrustRegionRadiusReached() {
|
|
if (iteration_summary_.trust_region_radius >
|
|
options_.min_trust_region_radius) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
solver_summary_->message = absl::StrFormat(
|
|
"Minimum trust region radius reached. "
|
|
"Trust region radius: %e <= %e",
|
|
iteration_summary_.trust_region_radius,
|
|
options_.min_trust_region_radius);
|
|
solver_summary_->termination_type = CONVERGENCE;
|
|
if (is_not_silent_) {
|
|
VLOG(1) << "Terminating: " << solver_summary_->message;
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Solver::Options::parameter_tolerance based convergence check.
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::ParameterToleranceReached() {
|
|
const double x_norm = x_.norm();
|
|
|
|
// Compute the norm of the step in the ambient space.
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_norm = (x_ - candidate_x_).norm();
|
|
const double step_size_tolerance =
|
|
options_.parameter_tolerance * (x_norm + options_.parameter_tolerance);
|
|
|
|
if (iteration_summary_.step_norm > step_size_tolerance) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
solver_summary_->message = absl::StrFormat(
|
|
"Parameter tolerance reached. "
|
|
"Relative step_norm: %e <= %e.",
|
|
(iteration_summary_.step_norm / (x_norm + options_.parameter_tolerance)),
|
|
options_.parameter_tolerance);
|
|
solver_summary_->termination_type = CONVERGENCE;
|
|
if (is_not_silent_) {
|
|
VLOG(1) << "Terminating: " << solver_summary_->message;
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Solver::Options::function_tolerance based convergence check.
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::FunctionToleranceReached() {
|
|
iteration_summary_.cost_change = x_cost_ - candidate_cost_;
|
|
const double absolute_function_tolerance =
|
|
options_.function_tolerance * x_cost_;
|
|
|
|
if (fabs(iteration_summary_.cost_change) > absolute_function_tolerance) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
solver_summary_->message = absl::StrFormat(
|
|
"Function tolerance reached. "
|
|
"|cost_change|/cost: %e <= %e",
|
|
fabs(iteration_summary_.cost_change) / x_cost_,
|
|
options_.function_tolerance);
|
|
solver_summary_->termination_type = CONVERGENCE;
|
|
if (is_not_silent_) {
|
|
VLOG(1) << "Terminating: " << solver_summary_->message;
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Compute candidate_x_ = Plus(x_, delta_)
|
|
// Evaluate the cost of candidate_x_ as candidate_cost_.
|
|
//
|
|
// Failure to compute the step or the cost mean that candidate_cost_ is set to
|
|
// std::numeric_limits<double>::max(). Unlike EvaluateGradientAndJacobian,
|
|
// failure in this function is not fatal as we are only computing and evaluating
|
|
// a candidate point, and if for some reason we are unable to evaluate it, we
|
|
// consider it to be a point with very high cost. This allows the user to deal
|
|
// with edge cases/constraints as part of the Manifold and CostFunction objects.
|
|
void TrustRegionMinimizer::ComputeCandidatePointAndEvaluateCost() {
|
|
if (!evaluator_->Plus(x_.data(), delta_.data(), candidate_x_.data())) {
|
|
if (is_not_silent_) {
|
|
LOG(WARNING) << "x_plus_delta = Plus(x, delta) failed. "
|
|
<< "Treating it as a step with infinite cost";
|
|
}
|
|
candidate_cost_ = std::numeric_limits<double>::max();
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!evaluator_->Evaluate(
|
|
candidate_x_.data(), &candidate_cost_, nullptr, nullptr, nullptr)) {
|
|
if (is_not_silent_) {
|
|
LOG(WARNING) << "Step failed to evaluate. "
|
|
<< "Treating it as a step with infinite cost";
|
|
}
|
|
candidate_cost_ = std::numeric_limits<double>::max();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::IsStepSuccessful() {
|
|
iteration_summary_.relative_decrease =
|
|
step_evaluator_->StepQuality(candidate_cost_, model_cost_change_);
|
|
|
|
// In most cases, boosting the model_cost_change by the
|
|
// improvement caused by the inner iterations is fine, but it can
|
|
// be the case that the original trust region step was so bad that
|
|
// the resulting improvement in the cost was negative, and the
|
|
// change caused by the inner iterations was large enough to
|
|
// improve the step, but also to make relative decrease quite
|
|
// small.
|
|
//
|
|
// This can cause the trust region loop to reject this step. To
|
|
// get around this, we explicitly check if the inner iterations
|
|
// led to a net decrease in the objective function value. If
|
|
// they did, we accept the step even if the trust region ratio
|
|
// is small.
|
|
//
|
|
// Notice that we do not just check that cost_change is positive
|
|
// which is a weaker condition and would render the
|
|
// min_relative_decrease threshold useless. Instead, we keep
|
|
// track of inner_iterations_were_useful, which is true only
|
|
// when inner iterations lead to a net decrease in the cost.
|
|
return (inner_iterations_were_useful_ ||
|
|
iteration_summary_.relative_decrease >
|
|
options_.min_relative_decrease);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Declare the step successful, move to candidate_x, update the
|
|
// derivatives and let the trust region strategy and the step
|
|
// evaluator know that the step has been accepted.
|
|
bool TrustRegionMinimizer::HandleSuccessfulStep() {
|
|
x_ = candidate_x_;
|
|
|
|
// Since the step was successful, this point has already had the residual
|
|
// evaluated (but not the jacobian). So indicate that to the evaluator.
|
|
if (!EvaluateGradientAndJacobian(/*new_evaluation_point=*/false)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
iteration_summary_.step_is_successful = true;
|
|
strategy_->StepAccepted(iteration_summary_.relative_decrease);
|
|
step_evaluator_->StepAccepted(candidate_cost_, model_cost_change_);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // namespace ceres::internal
|