Commit Graph

560 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mark Shachkov 6fb3dae4ee Add cuDSS as sparse Cholesky solver
cuDSS could be used as an alternative for SuiteSparse and EigenSparse
in case if CUDA capable GPU is available.

Change-Id: I7a567093ce91363478118153e181134ed5804573
2024-07-09 20:23:18 +02:00
Mark Shachkov 522210a08d Reuse macro to format version string
Change-Id: Ib21f2d8f06b6594dae410681d16a738b8b75c89a
2024-05-07 01:47:41 +02:00
MaximSmolskiy 2ffeb943ad Fix typo in AutoDiffManifold comment and docs
Change-Id: I0b50e3e10661578e68f713e34a59f65b3692e745
2024-01-29 03:19:37 +03:00
Sergiu Deitsch 91773746be Simplify instantiation of cost functions and their functors
If arguments are passed to a cost function that can be used to construct
the functor, the latter will be instantiated by the cost function using
std::make_unique to ensure exception safety. This not only avoids static
analysis warnings caused by calling new but also spelling the cost
functor type name multiple times.

Also expand deduction guides for instantiating
Dynamic(Auto|Numeric)DiffCostFunction from std::unique_ptr enabled
constructor overloads.

Finally, make CostFunction default move constructible and assignable but
only through derived classes. This in turn allows derived classes to be
movable without relying on custom implementations of corresponding
operators.

Change-Id: Idee8b9871d862bc9f9f8b5a8d0bedc52863e93c0
2024-01-23 01:34:27 +01:00
Sergiu Deitsch 8b88a9ab49 Use C++17 Bessel functions
Move Bessel functions availability checks from configuration time to
inclusion time to be more robust and allow the use of ABI compatible
compilers (e.g., Ceres is compiled using Clang but is used in a project
compiled using GCC.)

Since libc++ does not yet implement special math functions, we fallback
to their POSIX implementation if available. However, then only the
deprecated BesselJ{0,1,n} are provided.

Fixes #814

Change-Id: Ic3e62452b36e90cb22644cc8e553e3dd1881193f
2024-01-22 20:42:59 +01:00
Sameer Agarwal 2120eae674 Optimize the computation of the LM diagonal in TinySolver
This eliminates an entire vector and computation of a square root
followed by a squaring.

Thanks to @rlabbe for pointing this out.

Change-Id: I0de117b31b9332c61e687f18466d7cb2e2ac611e
2023-10-11 15:14:33 +00:00
Sergiu Deitsch 4519b8d774 Drop use of POSIX M_PI
Change-Id: I37342a366161bb13d6456ecc67569fe12705e05c
2023-10-04 22:59:15 +02:00
Sameer Agarwal b83abdcb19 Add a default value for Solver::Summary::linear_solver_ordering_type
Change-Id: I5c7c9acdc37ba0755d479ac9c6c2872fe89fb492
2023-10-04 13:26:20 -07:00
Sameer Agarwal 399395c4f1 Miscellaneous ClangTidy fixes
Change-Id: Iba2f8b1dccb77cefde750e5079e609b2b2a3ec95
2023-10-03 11:52:09 -07:00
Sergiu Deitsch 4893392195 Rework MSVC warning suppression
Previously, MSVC warning C4996 was suppressed unconditionally in the
entire code base which made it difficult identifying and fixing specific
problems, particularly those in the public interface.

Prefer now to disable warnings at the specific location they occur. This
approach, however, reveals an inconsistency in how Ceres handles POSIX
functions which are declared deprecated by MSVC. Specifically, Bessel
functions use the underscore form whereas the read function does not. To
simplify the logic, we revert to POSIX compatible functions.

C++23 also deprecates std::numeric_limits<T>::has_denorm which MSVC
warns about. Here, we disable the deprecation warning locally to avoid
the warning leaking into the user code.

Fixes #1013

Change-Id: Ida8457cc8dd8770b4384a7c49d16f213b02cdec4
2023-09-30 13:37:39 +02:00
Sameer Agarwal 4588b0fbbf Add an example for EvaluationCallback
Change-Id: Ia488f8b181118c8d07861149c4bd52f7217336ce
2023-09-28 21:49:32 +00:00
Sameer Agarwal 59182a42c3 Update documentation
Update the linear solver documentation thoroughly as it had
bit rotted and was flat out wrong in some places and incomplete
in others.

https://github.com/ceres-solver/ceres-solver/issues/865
https://github.com/ceres-solver/ceres-solver/issues/862

Change-Id: Ic395efabd0589a401e2b971c45869bd881b68a34
2023-09-27 09:27:29 -07:00
Sameer Agarwal dffd8cd71b Add an accessor for the CostFunctor in DynamicAutoDiffCostFunction
https://github.com/ceres-solver/ceres-solver/issues/962

Change-Id: I50c327eb7ac09a894582ee3fb3311825607640c0
2023-09-25 05:44:37 -07:00
Sameer Agarwal 5a30cae583 Preparing for 2.2.0rc1
1. Add a version history
2. Update copyright years across the code base
3. Run format_all.sh
4. Update version strings from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0 in the docs and
   elsewhere.

Change-Id: I46d8d479d54bd6002d532785e67342106e73c9ac
2023-09-21 11:23:38 -07:00
Sergiu Deitsch de9cbde95d Work around MinGW32 manifold_test segfault
Converting fixed size vectors to dynamic ones allows to avoid
segmentation faults in Eigen's packet math if the corresponding
expressions are invoked within GMock matchers.

Fixes #996

Change-Id: I7da5599883825ab0e580678d3d55de19095b41b1
2023-09-08 19:57:43 +02:00
Sameer Agarwal 357482db70 Add NumTraits::max_digits10 for Jets
Change-Id: Ief2c02eeaefba98d2540eb2f3428c65a98e36ef5
2023-07-29 12:35:30 -07:00
Hs293Go 96fdfd2e7a Implement tests for Euler conversion with jets
https://github.com/ceres-solver/ceres-solver/issues/965

Change-Id: I6bdabf5ee09c000e49ea1757fde724d4bc4ccb92
2023-04-27 16:42:25 -04:00
Sameer Agarwal db1ebd3ff5 Work around lack of constexpr constructors for Jet
https://github.com/ceres-solver/ceres-solver/issues/965

Change-Id: Ia74a64568815605586c1f326a55cc36b09f33f30
2023-04-18 16:26:24 -07:00
Sameer Agarwal 16a4fa04e2 Further Jet conversion fixes
https://github.com/ceres-solver/ceres-solver/issues/965

Change-Id: Ib80467eda4120b0483814e9e01e9644dd7ee91a7
2023-04-18 14:58:22 -07:00
Sameer Agarwal 92ad18b8ae Fix a Jet conversion bug in rotation.h
https: //github.com/ceres-solver/ceres-solver/issues/965
Change-Id: I4c99639be6afbfbefea3f9d56b6eaddbe4f23fe9
2023-04-18 09:18:01 -07:00
Dmitriy Korchemkin 54ad3dd03c Reorganize ParallelFor source files
Change-Id: Ic4941919e59210b48e447cbb61e539200c8c89df
2023-04-11 00:33:55 +03:00
Sergiu Deitsch 0315c6ca9a Provide DynamicAutoDiffCostFunction deduction guide
The deduction guide allows to avoid repeating the CostFunctor type.

Change-Id: I2285de37071006a97f89988baa9b7054d82dae86
2023-03-08 23:46:33 +01:00
Sameer Agarwal 79a554ffcf Fix a bug in QuaternionRotatePoint.
In https://ceres-solver-review.git.corp.google.com/c/ceres-solver/+/23802

the computation of the norm of a quaternion

scale = 1/sqrt(q[0] * q[0] + q[1] * q[1] + q[2] * q[2] + q[3] * q[3]);

was replaced by

scale = 1/hypot(q[0], q[1], hypot(q[2], q[3]));

while this appear to be a more accurate computation because of the
use of hypot which can handle over and underflow it introduces a
bug for the case where q[2] = q[3] = 0.

While the hypot(q[2], q[3]) == 0 as scalars, if q[2] and q[3] are
jets, then the derivative will be NaN. Which means that even though
q[0] or q[1] is non-zero and the norm of the quaternion is non-zero,
and the resulting derivative is finite, this way of computing the
scale will produce nans in the derivative of scale.

The following quaternion will replicate the problem described above.

using Jet = ceres::Jet<double, 4>;
std::array<Jet, 4> quaternion = {Jet(1.0, 0), Jet(0.0, 1), Jet(0.0, 2), Jet(0.0, 3)};

This CL reverts the change to QuaternionRotatePoint and
adds a test for it.

Thanks to Jonathan Taylor for reproducing this bug.

Change-Id: I0fbbcc77d6945a38563d82efba4429f4b5278cd5
2023-01-13 11:37:27 -08:00
Sergiu Deitsch cb6b306623 Use hypot to compute the L^2 norm
Change-Id: I908eaaa279452aa16346dfd3f25aac53685e3172
2023-01-05 21:44:53 +01:00
Sameer Agarwal 8e5d83f07d ClangFormat and ClangTidy changes
Change-Id: Ib457dcc55ffb405aeaeac711c20bd9217b32f90e
2022-12-17 17:29:42 -08:00
Alex Stewart 47e03a6d89 Add const accessor for Problem::Options used by Problem
Change-Id: I0fc48178c411887d4487a34599050d342f5344a2
2022-11-05 12:55:28 +00:00
Alex Stewart 6b296f27ff Fix missing namespace qualification and docs for Manifold gtest macro
Change-Id: Iae9a0d13191a777921208cb58d919f0e85b1bf92
2022-10-30 17:49:11 +00:00
Alex Stewart ccf32d70c7 Purge all remaining references to (defunct) LocalParameterization
Change-Id: Iad2a49bfa6916c22929d822e07f754ef77ed023d
2022-10-19 20:00:20 +01:00
Dmitriy Korchemkin b7116824b7 Evaluation benchmark
Benchmark for evaluation of residuals and evaluation of both residuals
and jacobian.

For each input file (in BAL format) specified on the command line two
sets of benchmarks are created for different number of threads.

BAL data is preloaded before starting benchmark.

Usage:
./bin/evaluation_benchmark [flags] input_1.txt ... input_N.txt

Change-Id: I543df65f483e3b186f52785b68bd5e2b3e3552a3
2022-09-21 13:40:03 +03:00
hs293go 2b89ce66f0 Add generalized Euler Angle conversions
Conversions function include Euler Angles to / from Rotation Matrices
and Quaternions. They are generalized for any Euler convention that can
be specified in the arguments. Algorithm is from "Euler angle
conversion", Ken Shoemake, Graphics Gems IV

Change-Id: I7f9ddc0b8d686efca16299d2ba374295744376ce
2022-09-20 22:14:19 +00:00
Sameer Agarwal 4cd257cf4a Let NumericDiffFirstOrderFunction take a dynamically sized parameter vector
Also fix a template naming lint along the way.

Change-Id: Iabb98aeec2ff9609a19c3778b9ea2da37771c985
2022-09-16 10:16:35 -07:00
Joydeep Biswas 829089053e CUDA CGNR, Part 4: CudaCgnrSolver
* Added CudaCgnrSolver, a new CUDA-accelerated CGNR.
* To use CudaCgnrSolver, the user must select CGNR as the linear_solver
  and CUDA_SPARSE as the sparse_linear_algebra_library.
* Updated ConjugateGradientSolver to work with an array of pointers to
  scratch to support CudaVectors as scratch.
* Moved CUDA initialization to run in Solver::Solve as needed.

Some performance comparisons on an Ubuntu 20.04 desktop with an
Intel i9-9940X CPU @ 3.30GHz, and an nVidia Quadro RTX 6000,
all configurations run with 24 threads, and 10 iterations.

=================================================
CGNR + CUDA_SPARSE + IDENTITY Preconditioner
problem-1778-993923-pre.txt
=================================================
Cost:
Initial                          2.563973e+08
Final                            1.724755e+06
Change                           2.546725e+08

Minimizer iterations                       11
Successful steps                            7
Unsuccessful steps                          4

Time (in seconds):
Preprocessor                         4.020158

  Residual only evaluation           1.567092 (10)
  Jacobian & residual evaluation     7.847130 (7)
  Linear solver                     31.688898 (10)
Minimizer                           46.834987

Postprocessor                        0.353974
Total                               51.209120

=================================================
SPARSE_SCHUR (CPU) + SUITE_SPARSE + AMD
problem-1778-993923-pre.txt
=================================================
Cost:
Initial                          2.563973e+08
Final                            1.651617e+06
Change                           2.547457e+08

Minimizer iterations                       11
Successful steps                           11
Unsuccessful steps                          0

Time (in seconds):
Preprocessor                        35.812003

  Residual only evaluation           1.658980 (10)
  Jacobian & residual evaluation    12.218799 (11)
  Linear solver                     76.409992 (10)
Minimizer                           98.809773

Postprocessor                        0.372712
Total                              134.994489

=================================================
ITERATIVE_SCHUR (CPU) + JACOBI Preconditioner
problem-1778-993923-pre.txt
=================================================
Cost:
Initial                          2.563973e+08
Final                            1.684447e+06
Change                           2.547128e+08

Minimizer iterations                       11
Successful steps                            8
Unsuccessful steps                          3

Time (in seconds):
Preprocessor                        15.331614

  Residual only evaluation           1.606114 (10)
  Jacobian & residual evaluation     8.502166 (8)
  Linear solver                    351.910080 (10)
Minimizer                          368.797327

Postprocessor                        0.363536
Total                              384.492478

=================================================
CGNR + CUDA_SPARSE + IDENTITY Preconditioner
problem-13682-4456117-pre.txt
=================================================
Cost:
Initial                          1.126372e+09
Final                            2.269329e+07
Change                           1.103678e+09

Minimizer iterations                       11
Successful steps                            7
Unsuccessful steps                          4

Time (in seconds):
Preprocessor                        19.140087

  Residual only evaluation           8.721920 (10)
  Jacobian & residual evaluation    41.955923 (7)
  Linear solver                    214.121861 (10)
Minimizer                          296.636890

Postprocessor                        1.971827
Total                              317.748804

Change-Id: I3a09f31aa6903f661e91f595afd39d427583e856
2022-08-15 23:44:34 -05:00
Sameer Agarwal 2c78c5f339 Small naming fixups.
use_power_series_expansion_initialization -> use_spse_initialization
max_linear_solve_iterations -> max_linear_solver_iterations

Change-Id: I7775fa9b1ad12e28c8d01d44349b7eaef9b57edd
2022-08-13 11:59:16 -07:00
Mark Shachkov 92d8379532 Enable usage of schur power series expansion preconditioner.
Add an option to use schur power series expansion for initialization
of pcg solution in ITERATIVE_SCHUR linear solver.

Change-Id: Ifb8bce02bc5f5ceebc74f961eefd3f6dd2ffab4a
2022-08-13 21:05:11 +03:00
Mark Shachkov 20e85bbe34 Add power series expansion preconditioner
Implementation of "Power Bundle Adjustment for Large-Scale 3D
Reconstruction" by Weber et. al. added in the form of preconditioner.

Change-Id: Ie85526a5fc46f74256f6dfe9173c3571f7160f3a
2022-08-11 19:34:41 +03:00
Julio L. Paneque f62dccdb37 Fix the Sphere and Line Manifold formulations
This PR changes the Sphere and Line Manifold formulations so that their
tangent spaces represent traveled angles (for the sphere and the line
direction vector) and traveled distance (for the line origin). These
magnitudes were previously halved according to "Hartley & Zisserman
(2nd Edition)", but in the majority of the state of the art this is not
done, following the convention that magnitudes in the tangent space of
the unit sphere represent geodesic distances traveled on that manifold.
The same scale factor appears in the Quaternion Manifold implementation
and will be studied in a further PR.

This PR also adds an additional case in the Sphere Minus operator when
hy_norm == 0. The value of y_minus_x was fixed to 0 but actually its
last term can also be Pi depending on y_last.

Finally, new unit tests for the Plus and Minus operator are added, along
with new tests for the 2D Sphere (a.k.a. Circle) Manifold.

Change-Id: I9456f1675b20da49bede5d6759aabf3cdfb26eae
2022-08-09 09:36:18 +02:00
Julio L. Paneque df55682ba5 Fix Eigen error in 2D sphere manifolds
Since Eigen does not allow to have a RowMajor column vector (see
https://gitlab.com/libeigen/eigen/-/issues/416), the storage order
must be set to ColMajor in that case. This fix adds that special
case when generating 2D sphere manifolds.

Change-Id: I594932e0dafc878e0b348f72524478588e61b34d
2022-08-05 11:25:29 +02:00
Sameer Agarwal 68c53bb395 Remove ceres::LocalParameterization
Change-Id: I3bdf2f6a8857db10c984024a27f490eefd23fefa
2022-07-29 22:29:23 +00:00
Sameer Agarwal 5af8e64497 Update year in solver.h
Change-Id: I49ffe5a24786aa32e7677785cc91ee914956f2e6
2022-07-13 09:09:37 -07:00
Joydeep Biswas 88e08cfe71 Mixed-precision Iterative Refinement Cholesky With CUDA
* Created a new class CUDADenseCholeskyMixedPrecision, which performs
  Cholesky factorization and solving in single (fp32) precision, and
  optionally performs iterative refinement.
* Added CUDA kernels for mixed-precision solve operations
* Added more detailed timing information to the FullReport about Schur
  elimination, reduced system solves, and back-substitution.

Some test performance numbers follow.
All tests were performed on an Ubuntu 20.04 desktop with an
Intel Core i9-9940X CPU and Nvidia Quadro RTX 6000 GPU.

Tests were launched as:
./bin/bundle_adjuster --input (problem_file) \
    --num_iterations 20
    --num_threads 28
    --linear_solver dense_schur
    --dense_linear_algebra_library (cuda|lapack)
    [--mixed_precision_solves]

==================================================
problem-21-11315-pre.txt
==================================================

--------------------------------------------------
Cuda Mixed Precision
--------------------------------------------------
Cost:
Initial                          4.413239e+06
Final                            3.037864e+04
Change                           4.382861e+06
  Linear solver                      0.250703 (14)
  ├ Schur eliminate                  0.234025 (14)
  ├ Reduced solve                    0.006643 (14)
  └ Backsubstitute                   0.006598 (12)

--------------------------------------------------
Cuda
--------------------------------------------------
Cost:
Initial                          4.413239e+06
Final                            3.037864e+04
Change                           4.382861e+06
  Linear solver                      0.257517 (12)
  ├ Schur eliminate                  0.233518 (12)
  ├ Reduced solve                    0.010621 (12)
  └ Backsubstitute                   0.007124 (12)

--------------------------------------------------
Lapack (OpenBLAS)
--------------------------------------------------
Cost:
Initial                          4.413239e+06
Final                            3.037864e+04
Change                           4.382861e+06
  Linear solver                      0.332349 (12)
  ├ Schur eliminate                  0.274748 (12)
  ├ Reduced solve                    0.015966 (12)
  └ Backsubstitute                   0.034192 (12)

==================================================
problem-257-65132-pre.txt
==================================================

--------------------------------------------------
Cuda Mixed Precision
--------------------------------------------------
Cost:
Initial                          2.456242e+07
Final                            9.677593e+04
Change                           2.446565e+07
  Linear solver                      1.332367 (20)
  ├ Schur eliminate                  1.021365 (20)
  ├ Reduced solve                    0.195472 (20)
  └ Backsubstitute                   0.075582 (20)

--------------------------------------------------
Cuda
--------------------------------------------------
Cost:
Initial                          2.456242e+07
Final                            9.677547e+04
Change                           2.446565e+07
  Linear solver                      1.810176 (20)
  ├ Schur eliminate                  1.012862 (20)
  ├ Reduced solve                    0.678704 (20)
  └ Backsubstitute                   0.083925 (20)

--------------------------------------------------
Lapack (OpenBLAS)
--------------------------------------------------
Cost:
Initial                          2.456242e+07
Final                            9.677547e+04
Change                           2.446565e+07
  Linear solver                      2.376273 (20)
  ├ Schur eliminate                  0.987613 (20)
  ├ Reduced solve                    1.043873 (20)
  └ Backsubstitute                   0.310402 (20)

==================================================
problem-744-543562-pre.txt
==================================================

--------------------------------------------------
Cuda Mixed Precision
--------------------------------------------------
Cost:
Initial                          1.434881e+08
Final                            1.546895e+06
Change                           1.419412e+08
  Linear solver                     27.010088 (20)
  ├ Schur eliminate                 24.362433 (20)
  ├ Reduced solve                    1.428542 (20)
  └ Backsubstitute                   0.814266 (20)

--------------------------------------------------
Cuda
--------------------------------------------------
Cost:
Initial                          1.434881e+08
Final                            1.546895e+06
Change                           1.419412e+08
  Linear solver                     32.342513 (20)
  ├ Schur eliminate                 24.638819 (20)
  ├ Reduced solve                    6.492090 (20)
  └ Backsubstitute                   0.802184 (20)

--------------------------------------------------
Lapack (OpenBLAS)
--------------------------------------------------
Cost:
Initial                          1.434881e+08
Final                            1.546895e+06
Change                           1.419412e+08
  Linear solver                     34.152224 (20)
  ├ Schur eliminate                 24.183723 (20)
  ├ Reduced solve                    8.784413 (20)
  └ Backsubstitute                   0.795044 (20)

Change-Id: I178887e776d8f4a1e8abb99bbc205bf8c278bf79
2022-07-13 06:55:31 -05:00
Sergiu Deitsch 4e5ea292ba Fixed MSVC 2022 warning
MSVC rightfully issues warning C4305: 'if': truncation from 'size_t' to
'bool' in a static_assert condition that implicitly converts sizeof
result to a boolean.

Change-Id: Ie3b913288bfeaa7a4b362ef7f83d2505ed368641
2022-06-24 00:12:09 +02:00
Alex Stewart 70f1aac31f Fix fmin/fmax() when using Jets with float as their scalar type
Change-Id: Ie7f400763f91b0e264a50401716321587ab1d477
2022-06-23 16:05:58 +01:00
Alex Stewart f11c256265 Fix fmin/fmax() to use Jet averaging on equality
- Prior to 48cb54d1, Ceres' fmin/fmax() for Jets followed the convention
  of std::min/max(), and always returned the first argument on equality,
  irrespective of whether this argument was natively a scalar or a Jet.
- After 48cb54d1, Ceres' fmin/fmax() instead returned the second
  argument on equality, again irrespective of whether this argument was
  natively a scalar or a Jet.
- Now on equality we average the arguments as Jets, which ensures that
  a consistent answer is produced irrespective of the ordering or type
  (Jet or scalar) of the input arguments. This also ensures that we
  preserve a non-zero derivative where it exists, excluding the edge
  case of two Jet inputs with equal but oppositely signed infinitesimal
  components.
- We retain the behaviour introduced in 48cb54d1 whereby NaNs are
  treated as missing values, following the convention of
  std::fmin/fmax().
- Raised as issue #816.

Change-Id: I01217c0e32c1be83be440e4515b57c79dd290923
2022-06-22 14:19:55 +01:00
Joydeep Biswas b90053f1ad Revert C++17 usage of std::exclusive_scan
* Unfortunately on some systems such as the Nvidia Jetson, while the
  compiler supports C++17, the STL implementations are incomplete.
  One such missing implementation is std::exclusive_scan, so this
  patch reverts to the old way of manually computing prefix sums.

Change-Id: I4192257519b0083560a4b44e2659ee44d7421105
2022-06-12 11:24:08 -05:00
Sameer Agarwal b4803778c3 Update documentation for linear_solver_ordering_type
Also update obsolete documentation related to building and
using sparse linear algebra libraries.

Change-Id: I83682b43472e6a6ec4e4dad32fa21c089d518c06
2022-06-07 14:08:26 -07:00
Sameer Agarwal 2335b5b4b7 Remove support for CXSparse
Eigen provides all the functionality that we need from CXSparse
with a more liberal license.

I will update the documentation in a follow up CL.

Change-Id: I0b9fd8be3c27754cc2986cc0e06595c8b3fdec0b
2022-05-27 09:20:21 -07:00
Sameer Agarwal 8ba8fbb173 Remove Solver::Options::use_postordering
This was an ill-advised and complicated to interpret option
which offers nothing particularly useful.

Change-Id: Ia7741ed62ef977c96fa52299a884e404bee659ac
2022-05-19 21:10:33 +00:00
Sameer Agarwal 39ec5e8f99 Add Nested Dissection based fill reducing ordering
With this change, the user can now choose between Approximate Minimum
Degree and Nested Dissection as a fill reducing algorithm when using
a sparse direct factorization based linear solver like SPARSE_NORMAL_CHOLESKY
or SPARSE_SCHUR.

Currenly only SUITE_SPARSE is supported. It requires that
SuiteSparse be compiled with Metis support enabled.

On most problems AMD is still the better choice, but in some cases
like the grid3D dataset from https://lucacarlone.mit.edu/datasets/
the solution time with AMD is 57s and with NESDIS 38 on my M1 Mac.

On some other problems at Google we have observed speedups of 10x,
there is also a corresponding decrease in the total amount of memory
used.

This patch is based on the original work done by NeroBurner in
https://ceres-solver-review.googlesource.com/c/ceres-solver/+/20580

1. Add a new enum to the public api LinearSolverOrderingType and
   a setting Solver::Options::linear_solver_ordering_type.
2. TrustRegionPreprocessor had some complicated logic which determined
   when linear solvers should reorder their matrices on their own and not
   this has been refactored into a more readable function that lives
   inside reorder_program.h/cc.
3. Plumbing in reorder_program.cc and trust_region_processor.cc to use
   nested dissection.
4. Update bundle_adjuster.cc to use nested dissection.

Change-Id: I388b027934f86c58b4da2b65a4fa5204ea73bf40
2022-05-19 12:36:20 -07:00
Evan Levine f1414cb5bd Correct spelling in comments and docs.
Change-Id: Iad9a0599d644d3b3cd54244edaf64d408cb1308e
2022-04-24 21:40:13 -07:00
Sameer Agarwal caf614a6c1 Modernize code using c++17 constructs
Mostly done using

find . \( -name '*.cc' -o -name '*.h' \) -a -type f -exec clang-tidy -p \
cmake-build -checks='-*,google-*,modernize-*,-modernize-use-nodiscard,-modernize-use-trailing-return-type' {} -fix \;

Change-Id: Ifccbcabe7a1d9a32a09d28ac4f3f8466696c1a50
2022-04-22 06:11:18 -07:00