colPivHouseholderQR -> householderQR
ldlt -> llt.
The resulting performance differences are significant enough
to justify switching.
LAPACK's dgels routine used for solving linear least squares
problems does not use pivoting either.
Similarly, we are not actually using the fact that the matrix
being factorized can be indefinite when using LDLT factorization, so
its not clear that the performance hit is worth it.
These two changes result in Eigen being able to use blocking
algorithms, which for Cholesky factorization, brings the performance
closer to hardware optimized LAPACK. Similarly for dense QR
factorization, on intel there is a 2x speedup.
Change-Id: I4459ee0fc8eb87d58e2b299dfaa9e656d539dc5e
1. Add an ExecutionSummary object to record execution
information about Ceres objects.
2. Add an EventLogger object to log events in a function call.
3. Add a ScopedExecutionTimer object to log times in ExecutionSummary.
4. Instrument ProgramEvaluator and all the linear solvers
to report their timing statistics.
5. Connect the timing statistics to Summary::FullReport.
6. Add high precision timer on unix systems using
gettimeofday() call.
7. Various minor clean ups all around.
Change-Id: I5e09804b730b09535484124be7dbc1c58eccd1d4
For problems with a small number of variables, but a large
number of residuals, it is sometimes beneficial to use the
Cholesky factorization on the normal equations, instead of
the dense QR factorization of the Jacobian, even though it
is numerically the better thing to do.
Change-Id: I3506b006195754018deec964e6e190b7e8c9ac8f
unnecessarily complexity in the structure of linear solvers and preconditioners.
This is the first step towards cleaning up the Preconditioner interface.
2. Minor tweaks and cleanups to the various linear solvers.
Sameer Agarwal